Americans are a hard-working bunch and should keep what they earn. Our ideas for tax reform reduce the burden of taxes while ensuring governments have the resources to focus on core responsibilities.
Democrats are flexing their muscles. On the fiscal front, they promise to fulfill their mandate for change by prudent fiscal management and looking out for the middle class. They never provided much detail to war-weary voters during the campaign. But now its time to get down to business and make good on their promises.
After years in the red, the Arizona Legislature finds itself with a near-$1 billion revenue surplus. Will the good times continue to roll?
The capital gains tax rate cut, Arizona's robust construction industry and the strong real estate market all contributed to the surplus.
The continuation of good economic times depends in large part on Washington making the capital gains tax rate cuts permanent and our state economy remaining healthy. Arizona policymakers can help do their part by cutting tax rates in 2006.
In a recent article, a Republic business columnist argued that opponents of the Phoenix Civic Plaza expansion and university lab funding lacked the vision of Arizona political giants like Carl Hayden and John Rhodes, writing that "If we'd have listened to the naysayers, California would happily have taken our water."
Earlier this year, Governor Janet Napolitano distributed to the press a study titled "The Way We Tax," which was released in the February issue of Governing Magazine. But the Governing study is far from being an ideologically neutral guide to good governance. In fact, the study has a strong bias in favor of higher taxation and higher spending.
In the 1980's TV series Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, galactic explorer Arthur Dent discovers that the ultimate answer to "life, the universe, and everything" is 42.
While the Goldwater Institute does not claim to have solved any of the deep mysteries of the cosmos, we do have "42 Ideas for a Free and Prosperous Arizona," that can be implemented this year to expand our freedom and economic prosperity. For example:
When Arizona sued the cigarette makers in 1996, the state minced no words in describing the pernicious effects of smoking: "Tobacco products are not only addictive, they are abnormally dangerous and unfit for human use. Tobacco products kill, maim, and injure virtually all who use them." Reading that, any rational person would have to conclude that the state would criminalize cigarettes. Evidently, consistency and logic take a back seat when big bucks are at stake.
Arizona has a long way to go before it can call itself a business-friendly state. Arizona's burden of state and local taxes on business as a percentage of gross state product is much higher than that of our competitor states Utah and Colorado. It is even higher than that of California, a state notorious for soaking businesses with high taxes.
Arizona's recent economic record has been impressive. Over the past 10 years, Arizona has been the third fastest-growing state in the country on average, Arizona's annual economic growth rate has been 1.6 percentage points faster than the national average. Job growth has been impressive, too. Nonfarm payroll employment grew over 33 percent, the second-fastest payroll employment growth in the country among all the states.
Like the U.S. Constitution, the Arizona Constitution clearly states the purpose and scope of government. The primacy of individual rights and its corollary, a government of strictly limited and defined powers, is established in the opening declaration:
When they take office, Arizona legislators promise to uphold the U.S. and Arizona Constitutions. The question is whether legislators, individually and collectively, fulfill their duty once in office.