Garbage In, Garbage Out -- An Examination of Private/Public Competition by the City of PhoenixPosted on January 01, 1998 | Type: Policy Report | Author: Robert J. Franciosi
Over the past twenty years, governments all over the world have transferred the responsibility for providing services out of their hands and into the private sector. One of the pioneers in this movement has been the city of Phoenix, Arizona. However, instead of dismantling the public agency providing the service and hiring a private contractor, the city allows the public agency to bid for the contract as well. Phoenix estimates the competitive process has saved it over $30 million since 1979.
Hotwiring Deregulation: How SRP Can Lead the Way to a Competitive Electric MarketPosted on September 01, 1997 | Type: Policy Report | Author: Melinda Ogle
At the end of 1996, the Arizona Corporation Commission passed a rule that phases in deregulation in the electricity industry over the next five years.
Infill: The Cure for Sprawl?Posted on August 01, 1997 | Type: Policy Report | Author: Tara Ellman
The modern metropolis, as critics see it, sends irregular tentacles of low density development snaking through pristine areas, leaving behind large amounts of unused land and under-used infrastructure. To many, the Phoenix metropolitan area epitomizes the problem. Policies to encourage more infill-that is, to locate more development within the urbanized area rather than on its fringes-are advocated as a route to more efficient use of land and existing infrastructure, preservation of open-space, decreased cost of public services, and improved economic and social conditions, as well as to alleviate the general atmosphere of disorder.
Twelve Ways to Keep the Valley Moving Without Expanding Public TransitPosted on August 01, 1997 | Type: Policy Report | Author: John Semmens
Traffic congestion and air pollution are urban problems that warrant attention. The wasted time and damage to our health posed by these problems merit efforts to mitigate their impact. For best results, the efforts to mitigate both traffic congestion and air pollution should focus on measures that are cost-effective. That is, we want to achieve the greatest reductions of traffic congestion and air pollution at as little cost as possible. This paper examines a variety of alternative methods for dealing with traffic congestion and air pollution.
Public Transit: Worthwhile Investment?Posted on April 01, 1997 | Type: Policy Report | Author: John Semmens
Should taxpayers pay to fund expansions in existing public transit? That is the question facing city governments throughout the Phoenix metropolitan region. Admittedly, the purported benefits of expanded public transit are seductive: reducing traffic congestion, improving urban air quality, helping the poor and promoting a community's prosperity. The following report examines each of these claims in detail and finds that public transit cannot make a cost-effective contribution to any of these objectives.