When Arizona resident Mark Reed planned to vote while wearing a “Tea Party” t-shirt, government officials wanted to keep him out of the polls. The Goldwater Institute argued that Tea Party shirts were constitutionally protected free speech, no different than shirts promoting unions or other advocacy groups. The courts agreed, requiring election officials to use uniform, objective standards without violating the constitution.
- Press Releases
- In the News
- OpEds & Blogs
Arizona Students Association v. Arizona Board of RegentsPosted on March 21, 2013 | Type: Case
The Goldwater Institute is representing five public university students whose First Amendment rights were violated when the Arizona Students Association used mandatory tuition surcharges to support a 2012 ballot initiative that the students opposed.
Mesa loses - againPosted on September 11, 2012 | Type: In the News
For at least 43 years, personal adornment has been deemed constitutionally protected free speech. It goes back to when the U.S. Supreme Court concluded you could wear a black armband to school to protest the Vietnam War and the principal couldn't stop you.
Arizona Supreme Court in Mesa case: 1st Amendment protects tattoosPosted on September 07, 2012 | Type: In the News
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Friday that tattooing is a form of free speech with full protection under the U.S. and state constitutions -- the first such decision by any state high court in the country.
Arizona Supreme Court chooses freedom for two entrepreneursPosted on September 07, 2012 | Type: Blog
Does the government have the right to deny business permits because neighbors complain? Today the Arizona Supreme Court said no.
It's Time to Give our First Freedom as Much Respect as the SecondPosted on May 30, 2012 | Type: Blog | Author: Nick Dranias
Arizonans have the right to bear arms nearly everywhere in this state without having to register anyone or anything with the government. Likewise, as mighty as the pen might be, no one should be forced to register themselves (or their pen) before communicating with elected officials about legislative reform. Yet, Arizona has done just that through its overreaching lobbying laws.