The U.S. Constitution and state constitutions guarantee certain rights. Too often, government violates those rights instead of protecting them. The Goldwater Institute is committed to constitutional rule of law and focuses on property rights, campaign finance, legislative terms, balance of power among levels of government, processes of judicial appointment, and state sovereignty, among others.
- Press Releases
- In the News
- Amicus Briefs
- OpEds & Blogs
In defense of anonymous speechPosted on November 08, 2011 | Type: Blog | Author: Nick Dranias
As often happens during election season, the media has been up in arms about “secret funds” being spent by independent groups on messages meant to support or oppose candidates. They should get a grip
Ten Reasons Why Arizona Must Reject Health Insurance ExchangesPosted on November 04, 2011 | Type: Policy Report | Author: Diane Cohen
States will not be able to maintain any meaningful control or "flexibility" by establishing a health insurance exchange. Likewise, any state that establishes an exchange will be enforcing the individual mandate.
Appeals court sides with tattoo shop in fight with MesaPosted on November 04, 2011 | Type: In the News
The Mesa City Council denied two tattoo artists the constitutional protections of free speech by rejecting their efforts to open a business two years ago, the Arizona Court of Appeals said Thursday.
Justice in every sensePosted on November 01, 2011 | Type: Blog | Author: Clint Bolick
This month marks Justice Clarence Thomas’ 20th anniversary on the U.S. Supreme Court. Emerging from one of the most tumultuous confirmation battles in history, Justice Thomas has become one of the greatest Supreme Court justices in the Court's history.
Imagine a world without secret votingPosted on October 25, 2011 | Type: Blog | Author: Taylor Earl
Last year, Arizonans overwhelmingly passed a constitutional amendment that told workers “if your company is deciding whether or not to unionize, you have a constitutional right to cast your vote in secret.” But now, the NLRB is trying to strike down the amendment through a federal lawsuit. If they succeed, a union sympathizer would be permitted to accost a fellow employee and watch as the employee votes on whether or not to unionize.